Skip to contents

Comparison

Source: vignettes/articles/comparison.Rmd
comparison.Rmd

The R ecosystem has two main packages that provide the HDF5 C library to other packages: hdf5lib (this package) and Rhdf5lib from Bioconductor. While both serve a similar purpose, they are built with different design philosophies and technical trade-offs. This article compares them to help you decide which is the right choice for your project.

At a Glance

The table below summarizes the key differences between the two packages.

Feature hdf5lib (CRAN) Rhdf5lib (Bioconductor)
Installation Zero-configuration Configurable at install-time
HDF5 Version Modern (v2.0.0) Older (v1.12.2 as of Bioc 3.19)
Build Type Static library only Static or shared library
Thread-Safety Enabled by default Not supported
API Version Control Simple api flag in c_flags() Requires manual -D flags
Ecosystem General purpose Primarily for the Bioconductor ecosystem

Key Differences Explained

1. Installation and Configuration

  • hdf5lib is designed for simplicity. Installation via install.packages("hdf5lib") is a “zero-config” process. It always builds its bundled HDF5 source code with a standard, modern feature set (including thread-safety and high-level APIs). This ensures a consistent and reliable build for downstream packages with no effort from the user.

  • Rhdf5lib is designed for flexibility. It provides several configure arguments that allow users to customize the HDF5 build. For example, users can choose to link against a system-installed HDF5 library or disable features like the high-level APIs. While powerful, this flexibility means that a downstream package developer cannot be certain which HDF5 features will be available on a user’s machine.

2. HDF5 Version

  • hdf5lib bundles a modern version of HDF5 (v2.0.0). This gives developers immediate access to the latest features, bug fixes, and performance improvements, such as native complex number support and better UTF-8 handling on Windows.

  • Rhdf5lib typically bundles an older, long-term support version of HDF5 that is standard across the Bioconductor ecosystem (v1.12.2 as of Bioconductor 3.19). This prioritizes stability within that ecosystem over access to the newest features.

3. Thread-Safety

  • hdf5lib builds HDF5 with thread-safety enabled by default. This is a critical feature for modern R packages that use parallelism (e.g., via RcppParallel), as it prevents data corruption when multiple threads access an HDF5 file. For more details, see the article on Parallel Programming.

  • Rhdf5lib does not support building with thread-safety enabled.

4. API Version Control

  • hdf5lib provides a simple api argument in its c_flags() and ld_flags() helper functions. This makes it trivial for a developer to lock their package to a specific HDF5 API version (e.g., api = 114), ensuring that future updates to hdf5lib will not break their package. This feature is explained in detail in the API Versioning article.

  • Rhdf5lib does not provide a dedicated mechanism for this. A developer would need to manually add the appropriate -D flags to their Makevars, and the underlying library may not contain the symbols for all API versions.

Conclusion: Which Should You Use?

Choose hdf5lib if:

  • You want a simple, reliable dependency that “just works” for you and your users.
  • You need modern HDF5 features.
  • You plan to use multithreading (e.g., with RcppParallel).
  • You want to lock your package to a specific API version for long-term stability.

Choose Rhdf5lib if:

  • Your package is part of the Bioconductor ecosystem and you need to maintain strict compatibility with it.
  • You need to link against a specific, older configuration of HDF5 that is not met by hdf5lib’s default build.